Downton Abbey 4:8: On a green sward, in a darkened room

MrsB
Anna Bates (Joanne Froggatt)

MrBates
John Bates (Brendan Coyle)

She: ‘I wish I knew what you were up to yesterday [in York]. You’d never do anything foolish. You’d never risk everything we’ve built together [voices rises …]
He: ‘Certainly not. You know me. When I I do a thing I like to have a very good reason for doing[voice falls off …] ‘
She looks at him, he turns, begins to walk down the darkened hall, she stands there strained, then follows …

Foreverfriends
Daisy (Sophia McShea), Alfred (Matt Milne)

Alfred: ‘Forever friends.’
Daisy: ‘Forever friends.’

Dear friends and readers,

Let’s cut to the chase. Do we now have reason to suspect that Mr Bates did indeed murder the 1st Mrs Bates? This fascinating character who begins as a humiliated disabled man, loyal comrade and servant to his lordship, kindly, generous, sterling husband material, has many less than exemplary skills. It was his threat against a fellow-prisoner that helped him escape treachery in prison. He’s also a past master at forging signatures.

So, off-stage (how many recall that Violet, Lady Grantham aka Maggie Smith said she’s not keen on Greek drama convention?) the man who brutally assaulted and raped Anna Bates, Mr Green (Nigel Harman) died, it’s said by slipping or falling into the road, hit by a bus, a crowd all round, people saw it, Piccadilly it was. This is uncomfortably close to the way the 1st Mrs Bates (Maria Doyle Kennedy) bit the dust. Off-stage too, it’s [now] said she took an overdose deliberately, but did she? no witnesses at all, Mr Bates was framed (so we were led to suppose), but there was that split-second shot of her sprawled out on the floor, an odd position for someone not pushed down by someone else.

Did Mr Bates go to London on the day he told Mr Carson he was going to York, after having ascertained in a conversation with the hubristic Green that Green lived with his Lordship, Gillingham (Tom Cullen) just off Piccadilly? Or was it he overheard (as he seems to lurk in corners) Anna conveying somehow or other to the suddenly shocked Lady Mary that it was Green because Lady Mary has told her Gillingham will be back for visit with his man:

REalizing

Latercollectinghim

And what did he there?

He told Mr Carson (Jim Carter) who noticed something about him in the dark room cleaning shoes, that it had been “a long day.”

MrCarterBates

The duelling code immediately recurred to obliquely by Anna upon being raped (Part 3) as her reason why she must not report the rapist, not hostilely but rather in fear Bates will have to pay for it by a life sentence or hanging “this time”, has reached fruition.

So too we see the workings of an aristocratic code of loyalty to one’s crew. Lady Mary (Michelle Dockery) will have evidence of Bates’s having been in London not York in the so-called Christmas coda to come; but in this episode she is already morally sure and so asked Charles Blake (Julian Ovenden) whose judgement Mary now trusts if he knew someone he liked and that person did something troubling (word to this effect), what would you do, to which Blake: “But you don’t believe he was wrong,” Mary: “No,” Blake: “Well I’m guessing but I suspect I would say nothing.”

LadymaryBlake

I cannot condone it and know I ought to declaim against it — it’s a measure of how much this mini-series soap opera has won me over that I am content not to overlook it and deplore its source: revenge killing belong to the same world-view as honor-killing, is as lawless (& therefore dangerous to us all) as rape, or (for that matter) stand your ground laws. It’s unexpected even in the reactionary universe of Fellowes; doubtless he’d justify it by saying in the 1920s there was no recourse for preventing an occurrence of acquaintance rape from the law or courts (there is barely one now), and how were Anna and Bates to know that Gillingham had sacked Green. Green must’ve been having a bad week — not that he didn’t deserve to be sacked.

Far from boring characters as they seemed to be, as Season 4 began, the happily married pair, Mr and Mrs Bates lived through a differing but shared agon: she, raped, cannot bear any man near her at first, shamed, blaming herself, as some lines of Bates’s referring to how she seemed to favor Green at first (he: “You liked him so much … thought he was funny …” She: .. “Did I? I can’t remember”), reinforce her unhealed anguish; and their story turns on issues of hot moment today.

And like other of the threads of this season’s finale, only semi-resolved.

greensward (1)

People have been asking on a list-serv I’m in if this was the finale? well, within the aesthetics of soap opera there is no finale.

At the close of a phase of a min-series, there is usually not just an ending of one story, but the beginning of another and quite different one -— though the two may be linked thematically. Further the first doesn’t really end, but carries on, from a different angle, and the actual central tensions of the part of the story we were intensely engaged in (the coerced match of two fundamentally unlike and in their characters incompatible people) are not resolved or got over, but only deferred into a kind of stasis. Substories are set adrift … time moves inside the series and the characters age, some disappearing altogether … and then returning …

So what we had in this week’s hour was a series of semi-resolutions, persistence of other stories, new developments, continuations. Other bloggers have also noticed that at the end of each season, we’ve had the festivity where all are brought together, often on the great lawn around the Abbey: season 1, the garden party climaxing in WW1; season 2, the first and truest of the Christmas episodes, just one gathering after another, season 3, the cricket game reinforced by the dance and Christmas festivities in the Highlands; and now, season 4, the church bazaar. Such scenes dramatize all the characters’ relationships to one another; they function to reiterate, reinforce, reassure. The fictive system goes on. Perhaps it was a little obvious this time but the satisfaction of seeing favorite put-upon characters suddenly winning, worms turning, characters taught lessons or teaching them is too strong to be denied.

TomMissBuning
Tom (Allen Leech) and Sarah Bunting (Daisy Lewis), at the bazaar as a local school teacher

New couples emerging: Tom and Miss Bunting first met at a political meeting, then he came across her in a field with her car stalled and reverting to his chauffeur past, fixed it and told her of himself and Sybil, of her death. I wish he were not so determined to separate himself from his socialism, to justify the lifestyle of the rich family who have taken him in as all about the work ethic, beasts of burden (like Cora, Countess of Grantham carrying a heavy bouquet of flowers in a heavy pottery). It feels like a betrayal of his character when he abjures his socialism; when he rejects the idea of types he is unsound, forgetting all his vaunted reading. He is swaying back and forth as he tries to find a new identity — no longer Irish revolutionary, now gentleman-steward for the Granthams and their son-in-law. We have to turn to Mrs Crawley to defend Tom as a political thinker (alas on muddled anti-socialist grounds that he shows how smart he is by doubting his former creed).

Shepraying

On the other hand, I just love how Molsely and Miss Baxter are slowly coming together, each helping the other towards a stronger self-esteem, cheer, success (Molseley hits the jackpot when urged by Miss Baxter), culminating in Molseley getting between Thomas Barrow’s (Rob James-Collier) mean bullying and threats for information from her. Meanwhile her sewing machine on the servants’ hall table has become a fixture, an icon referred to, out of her past which we surmize we will learn more of next year.

Sewingmachine

Even Isobel Crawley (Penelope Wilton) is coming in for a new friendship: Lord Merton (Douglas Reith), a Crawley connection, come to visit Violet, turns out to be a widower with unhappy memories of a failed marriage attracted to the widow with good memories.

Comicallylookingon
Dowager comically (she had not expected this) looking on

Sadness is not left altogether behind in these new pairs.

Widowergoofing
As will happen Lord Merton has forgotten and asks Isobel what her son does?

It’s seriously part of Alfred (Matt Milne) and Daisy’s (Sophia McShea) moving goodbye scene.

At last the kitchen quartet generated real feeling — because they were given enough time and scenes. And because Mr Mason (remember him, William, Daisy’s dead young husband’s father) is brought back and his presence lends gravitas. Alfred is coming for a last goodbye now that Ivy (in this episode) has answered his letter containing a marriage proposal with a decided no, and, wanting to spare Daisy and not altogether in sympathy with Ivy’s (Cara Theobold) optimism that life has more in store for her than Alfred can offer, Mrs Patmore (Lesley Nicol) has given her the day off.

MrMasonDaisy

When she asks him, doesn’t he want her to stay past six, he says he’d like her to stay forever but “there won’t be too many people you love in your life and he’s one,” so she must say goodbye, with “nothing jagged, nothing harsh.” And in the event as Alfred begins to hint he’ll have her now, she says she loved him once, but “it’s too late,” and they agree to part “forever friends.” This is not smaltz and it’s given steel as when we last see Daisy even though Mrs Patmore says how proud she is of Daisy, the noble gesture has not made Daisy any the less hurt, raw (especially to Ivy still) and bleak from the experience:

Daisy

Others may disagree but I don’t feel there is the same complex of feeling in the story which sets another character adrift: the love affair of Lady Rose MacClare (Lily James) and the very black Jack Ross (Cary Carr): I found myself cringe at his deference and complete lack of resentment or anger: he breaks off the engagement because he loves her so and would not want to “spoil” her life? Lady Mary’s argument against this marriage is one used by racists in the US for decades. It runs like this “I’ve nothing against it of course, but think how others would treat you.” Rose’s behavior is dismissed as daughter-spite and we get some unexamined mother-bad-mouthing all round (when in the Scots Christmas episode Lady Fincher played beautifully by Phoebe Nicholls as a woman unhappily married, frustratingly situated) as excuse. Well acted and wisely acted in an evasive understated way,

wellacted

It still won’t do. Fellowes revealed his own inability to endow this black character with full humanity or understand how a young white woman might like a kindly jazz artist.

The weakest because so clichéd matter was that of Lady Mary and her three suitors. It is another measure of the richness of this year’s episodes that by this one we have mostly forgotten the effective grief-striken opening and Dockery’s expressionistic performance. She does well here too, for the scenes of polite male suitors at table, by a car, walking alongside, are often saved by a witty remark by Lady Mary herself (“hasn’t I disappointed enough men?”). The thread was not distasteful, there were some dream-like palatial cathedral restaurant moments

Palacerestaurant

and the two prominent male actors maintained their dignity, their deference to this princess’s coolness and supposed hard-working strength — though she has but one tenant, Drew (Andrew Scarborough) who agrees to take on the pigs too, be steward if Tom should suddenly decamp (though that seems less and less likely) and act out another cynosure of deference and gratitude.

Drew

The quick-witted old hand at soap opera techniques will notice that Lady Edith, now pregnant (Laura Carmichael) is looking on, and observes how loyal is this family man. A solution to her difficulties? her desire to keep her baby if not in the castle with her, nearby. Edith’s story became more subdued as she was re-marginalized into second sister, took less space in the tapestry, and seen within a triangle of her own and the perspectives of her aunt, Lady Rosemary Painswick (Samantha Bond) and grandmother (it doesn’t take Violet too long to gather the trip to Switzerland to learn French where the hospitals are so good is for Edith to have her baby in secret).

Some of the hour’s best lines come in this thread, wry, sarcastic, irritated, pressingly persuasive (both aunt and grandmother are against the baby coming back with Edith as then the secret will visibly out itself). “Don’t bully me, granny.” “Are you afraid I’ll lose the baby?” And they have the best hats:

Edith (2)
Facing her mother who says her way of coping with French is to speak English much louder

Edith (1)

This thread has one withheld character, Michael Gregson whose return we await — expect. The other of Lord Grantham (Hugh Bonneville) himself, taken to New York to defend Cora’s brother’s part in the teapot dome scandal, has been accounted for from outside the series. Bonneville went to London to act on stage. His return and congratulations to his wife, on her success as mistress of the bazaar carried off persuasively and sweetly:

coraRobert

The success and whole management of the bazaar which provides the fun background of the hour’s last 20 minutes is however due to Trollope, and especially Barchester Towers from whom some of the games and the whole sense of a community of different orders of people engaged in ritual play were drawn.

I’ve tried to emphasize the art of this hour, the tapestry formations, the four-year felt fictive system (so to speak) because this is the source of its satisfying unfolding. For myself I’ve told on my Sylvia blog what pulls me into this world: “the characters are presented all together in such real feelingful ways”

For official recaps across the four seasons

Next week the coda.

Ellen

Author: ellenandjim

Ellen Moody holds a Ph.D in British Literature and taught in American senior colleges for more than 40 years. Since 2013 she has been teaching older retired people at two Oscher Institutes of Lifelong Learning, one attached to American University (Washington, DC) and other to George Mason University (in Fairfax, Va). She is also a literary scholar with specialties in 18th century literature, translation, early modern and women's studies, film, nineteenth and 20th century literature and of course Trollope. For Trollope she wrote a book on her experiences of reading Trollope on the Internet with others, some more academic style essays, two on film adaptations, the most recent on Trollope's depiction of settler colonialism: "On Inventing a New Country." Here is her website: http://www.jimandellen.org/ellen/ No part of this blog may be reproduced without express permission from the author/blog owner. Linking, on the other hand, is highly encouraged!

12 thoughts on “Downton Abbey 4:8: On a green sward, in a darkened room”

    1. So you have by a very circuitous form of reasoning based on whole scale suppositions decided Mr Barrow was the murderer, another attempt to frame Mr Bates. You’ll find no one will go along with you any more than they do the theory that Jane Fairfax is pregnant by John Knightley. It’s not the former is as preposterous; it’s that the methodology is the same.

  1. Hi Ellen,

    I enjoy your blogs about Downton Abbey. I was wondering how everyone felt though about what Bates did or may have done to Mr. Green. I haven’t seen the final episode yet – will this Sunday – so maybe I shouldn’t ask yet, but why was the scene of Green’s death not shown? Are we to be left wondering whether it was an accident or murder, or did the producers/writers just not feel they could pull of a murder made to look like an accident. Maybe it’s just to hold our suspense for the next episode, but if not, I was disappointed that we did not see what happened.

    Tyler

  2. Tyler asks an interesting question which relates to all our talk of undramatized scenes: Tyler if you have watched 4:8, then you will learn no more specifically in the Christmas episode. What happened will remain as ambiguous as now the death of Mrs Bates has again appeared to be. There will be a proof situating Bates nearby but that wouldn’t make a case as strong against him as the death of Mrs Bates.

    I see Tyler you tend to agree with the modern idea that not dramatizing indicates weakness. Sometimes it does, but I find novelists who write unreal dialogues on stilted (as A.S. Byatt is capable of) are worse in some of their dramatized scenes. In C.P. Snow’s book he shows how wonderfully naturalistic and yet not realistic at all are Trollope’s dramatized scenes. In my essay on the Pallisers I dwell on a couple of dramatized scenes in the film which in Trollope are left told but I don’t think the left told scenes inferior at all. What we have is the delight of the ironic narrator telling us.

    Why does Fellowes chose not to dramatize it? Most obviously, he wants us to be sympathetic to Bates still. If we saw Bates say push Green into the sidewalk, say kick him slightly (in the way O’Brien once did to Bates causing him to fall flat on the grounds — no bus was coming) we would condemn Bates and Fellowes would get outraged mail.

    He likes to keep his series as realistic as possible: life is ambiguous. Myself I don’t think anything is lost this way and a lot gained — the emphasis remains on Bates and Anna’s relationship. I do wish we had had some voice-over (something Fellowes wrongly eschews) for Anna enabling us to get inside her mind. that’s the gap I mind and think diminishes the 4th season badly.

    I’ll mention that the scene in Austen’s S&S where Edward Ferrars is disinherited is not dramatized but told by Mrs Jennings: only the 1971 script and film by Constanduros keeps it as told scene and Patricia Routledge conveys the comedy of the perspective on the traumatized scenes; 4 of the others include it and it’s overdone melodrama which is not funny (slapstick is put in some of them and falls flat).

  3. Hi Ellen,

    Bates does have a rental in London, his employer and wife are both gone from the abbey, he could have used the time to see to some matter relating to this rental. The sinister looks and music may be a decoy. When thinking of Bates’s moral nature, remember that he went to prison for his wife’s theft, a woman he may not have loved much. Then he gave up a job he loved to keep the first Mrs. Bates from revealing about Mary and Pamul Kamuk.

    Because of the decoy music/sinister looks throwing us off, I expect Bates is planning some surprise for Anna. Still, it seems he wouldn’t sell the London house to buy a place for him and Anna, without talking about it with her.

    In the same way that Anna cannot lie to Bates, I expect that Bates couldn’t get away with lying to Anna – she would see through him.

    Bates is the mega-protector, his way of being a Big Man. Anna being raped may have sent him over the edge. The only way he could cope was in planning revenge. I think it could go either way, whether he killed Green or not. Let’s not forget either that if Green raped Anna he probably has many rapes in his past and he may have been pushed but not by Bates!
    ~ Linda

    My issue now is that Julian Fellowes has said he won’t write for both DA and The Gilded Age (his new series) at the same time, and season 5 could be the last.

    1. Linda, we don’t know that Bates kept up that rental; we are told nothing about it for (in effect) years. I doubt he’d spend the little money he and Anna gets on rent. They’d be squirreling it away for when they might retire and find that they want to leave the cottage and say go live on the coast where the land and sea are beautiful.

      All the evidence as presented now suggests that Bates murdered his wife, but not quite cleverly enough; the years have taught him how better to cover his tracks. He has now made Anna safe from Mr Green. There was no other way he felt. That she and Mrs Hughes and Lady Mary felt he needed to be by Anna suggests they felt Green constituted a real and present danger as long as he stayed there at night.

      Ellen

  4. The answer to Tyler’s question is simple: bit.ly/1ffNl4n As I explain in this linked blog post, by NOT showing us how Green dies, Fellowes is able to create a great deal of subtle ambiguity as to how he dies—who is the murderer? I say it is NOT Bates, and in my post give two very plausible alternatives, which both have a rich Shakespearean subtext,

  5. Hi Arnie and Ellen,
    Thank you for your comments. I imagine Fellowes wants us to be left wondering what happened – I will agree with you both it is not a weakness that the scene wasn’t depicted – perhaps he wants us to suspect Bates, only to relieve us later that it wasn’t – and maybe not to be resolved until next season, but like Ellen, my first thought was, if he killed Green, could he have killed the first Mrs. Bates as well.

    And I’ve been waiting for Isobel Crawley and the Doctor to get together, so what’s up with the new man interested in her?

    Tyler

  6. My respect for Fellowes has increased tenfold as a result of his clear willlingness to keep something very big unexplicit, that’s the mark of a confident writer, who doesn’t feel the need to beat his reader/audience over the head with explicitness. This will all come out in Season Five, rest assured.

  7. I understood Bates’s mother’s house to be owned free and clear. At one point, Anna and Mrs. Hughes go to London to clean it up, after the first Mrs. Bates died, and Anna found an address book of Vera’s. I thought they were getting it ready to rent out. And you’re right, this house hasn’t been mentioned since Bates was in prison.

    I thought that Mrs. Hughes and Lady Mary (and Bates too) didn’t want him to go to America because Anna was too emotionally fragile. I didn’t think about protecting Anna from a repeat rape!

    It was so shallow of Lady Mary to think she had to speak out about the train ticket in Bates’s coat, and then when he saves the family honor in retrieving the purloined letter, she burns the train ticket.

    On about the 4th rewatch of the finale/UK Christmas special (I watch it on primewire.com as it comes out in the UK), I noticed an Americanism when Cora called the Prince of Wales “Sir” without first calling him “Your Royal Highness”, when he came to Rose’s ball, and Mrs. Dudley Ward made up for it by using the phrase when speaking to Cora of him immediately following.

    I always try to predict the coming season, but must say, Julian Fellowes always outdoes me.

    Linda”

  8. Dear Linda,

    Fellowes may have partly forgotten the Bates’s own a house in London — it was not common for servants to have such a thing; taxes would have to be paid. It seems to me that the finances of Downton though presented as so important are in fact left vague: to keep such a huge staff costs money and if Grantham lost all his wife’s money then Matthew must’ve inherited a huge amount to make up the difference. We are also not told anything specific about the cost of farming and what Mary is doing literally: all we see is one tenant farmer. It’s very thin this accounting for money — in reality such a family would be very rich and if the taxes hurt, they would not do permanent damage — or they’d have retrenched a long time ago.

    I too watch the episodes over and over. I’ve got the screen plays for two seasons, the companion books and am looking forward to having the screenplay for all the season eventually.

    Ellen

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.