Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Autobiographical’ Category


Leon Cogniet (1794-1880), The Artist in His Room at the Villa Medici, Rome (1817)

Dear friends and readers,

The Admiral (aka Jim) and I returned this afternoon from a two day interlude in NYC of nearly non-stop delightful (really) visits and talk with friends, a birthday party, walking in Manhattan and Central Park (whenever it was in the way we went through or at least into a path), time in galleries (Neue Galerie on 86th to see an exhibit of startlingly sexually candid and disquieting Viennese art, circa 1890 to 1920ish), time in the Met museum, bookstores. During lulls on trains, the subway, when I couldn’t sleep at first from excitement and anxiety and generally (as I usually do) to keep my mind calm, I absorbed myself by reading Elizabeth Von Armin’s Enchanted April, finished an unfortunately nowadays unsung masterpiece in the Ivy Compton-Burnett vein, Angus Wilson’s Anglo-Saxon Attitudes and then Winston Graham’s nineteenth century historical novel, Cornelia (on both of which latter more perhaps next week).

This is a brief report on the exhibits we saw — whose centrality in most of my travel accounts I excuse by saying I am a lover of pictures. Maybe that’s why I so love films too. The Met as ever is overcrowded with people and nooks and crannies of unexpected new and rearranged art. The most memorable is Sabine Rewald’s (doubtless the daughter, granddaughter or niece of the great scholar of impressionism, John Rewald) Rooms with a View, several rooms filled with pictures which include windows. It is an odd exhibit. It is described by her and elsewhere as inspired by her love of Caspar David Friedrich (1774-1840) and his imitators, e.g., George Kersting (1785-1847, Woman Embroidering by a window) and Carl Gustave Carus (1789-1869, Woman on a Balcony) and as about views seen through windows in Romantic painting. The lead picture plus the blown up ones at the opening and end of the exhibit are of characters looking out a window:

However, most of the pictures instead show characters resolutely ignoring the view (one is even titled that) or for the most part oblivious to it except as the sun provides some light on their work (as in Leon Cogniet’s above). Funnily some of the pictures show the windows covered up by curtain. viz.,


Adolph Menzel (1815-1905), The Artist’s Sitting Room in Ritterstrasse (1851).

In some we are to see the artist is wasting time looking out, most of those having views show unreal perspectives because it’s most unlikely that the window would be so beautifully squared on just the picturesque angle we repeatedly see. Most appear wholly unself-conscious of this falseness; a rare witty exception is


Martin Drolling’s (1752-1817) Girl Tracing a Drawing (undated, early 19th century)

where it’s still not clear that we are to realize what we usually see through windows in paintings is artificially set up. Many of the pictures have windows because rooms do have windows. It is also disturbing that not one picture is by a woman though windows in pictures are so common in women’s paintings as to constitute an obsession, a melancholy sort of joke about how a woman looks out on the world through her enclosed environment,


Jane Freilicher (b. 1924), Casement Window (1974)

To be fair, Rewald acknowledges the woman’s angle in her lead picture, and she does show an interest in paintings sheerly of windows (many of her photos and studies of paintings are of windows, particularly when painted by Friedrich) and some of the views captured are original in feel, not pastiche,


Friedrich Wasmann (1805-86), A View of the Campagne (1832)

What puzzled me and Jim was how nothing was sorted; all the different motifs or types just higgledy-piggedly as if to distract the viewer from perceiving the contradictions and absurdities in the chosen paintings.

Among other pictures viewed a the Met we loved a room of very late 19th to early 20th century art, much of which we’d never seen before, neither impressionistic or anecdotal, not falling into any school at all. We tried to like the pastel portraits of the 18th century and did, but since most of the pictures were of people we’d probably have rightly disliked intensely in life (arrogant aristocrats flattered excessively), we were not bothered that we had to hurry through.

The Neue Galerie is the first private gallery we’ve ever gone to. Countless museums, many small, and we were therefore a little disappointed since the permanent collection was not on display. Jim is taken by the Vienna 1900 art and we stayed quite a while looking at Gustav Klimt, Oskar Kokoschka, and Egon Schiele (see a sample). I agree they are important as breaking down taboos that uphold systems of privilege and power, that make for unhappiness through repression, and I did love the landscapes,


Schiele, Town Among Greenery (1917)

But some of the pictures of women masturbating, the complete absence of women artists and focus on genital sex, the harrowed imagery of trauma, distress, derangement, and cruelty were not exactly pleasant. I am not keen on gilded designs and abstractions either. In short, I would not have liked to own any of this and had no desire to buy a book, though I acknowledged that the choice of art books and literary accompaniment in the book store showed great care and money had been spent in putting together a learning experience. I could have bought myself a hard-to-get Zweig short story volume, Rilke’s poems, histories of Weimar. Instead I bought at the Strand (hurrah still going strong apparently) the book of the exhibit of Open Windows even if much less intelligently put together.

What else can I celebrate? My friend’s birthday party in Brooklyn took place in a non-pretentious restaurant in far Brooklyn (the stop on the BMT, the Q train, was Avenue U), with good food: 3 hours of good talk, a time filled with warm feeling among friends. I learned a lot about Brooklyn! We had two yummy meals with good friends originally met here on the Net, one brief phone call. As ever Central Park is this pastoral place fiercely protected by the Conservatory so as to be both beautiful and a public playground, picnic, idyllic exercise haven. Even the subway had its charm. I cannot recommend the Hotel Wales where we stayed: while the hotel is respectable, i.e., safe and quiet and mostly comfortable, the room was so small for the price we paid, it felt like a dark closet, and I couldn’t sleep the first night also because of the noise made by an inefficient window air-conditioner, but it was in a convenient part of town for us. One of our friends lives in an apartment from which we could view much of Manhattan around it, to the old fair grounds of Queens, the river and beyond. I began for the first time to “get” Starbucks. A place where you can wind down to appropriate music, drink coffee and consult your laptop as you watch the people around you and going by the windows of the store.

We did acquire a few new books beyond the Rewald’s Rooms with a View: Daphne Du Maurier’s Cornwall fantasy landscape, Castle Dor, two keepsakes from friends, L. I. Davis’s A Meaningful Life and a paperback single volume edition of Jocelyn Harris’s edition of Richardson’s Grandison (handy for working with on a paper and bringing to conferences).

I did feel the old urge to want to return to live in NYC. A fine place to live but hard to visit is my motto. It’s so vast with so many places with interesting things to see, hear (lecture series, concerts galore) and stuffed to the gills with people that one gets a healthier perspective on life than in a suburban homogeneous limited environment. We also have friends there and think we could make more and be much happier therefore in this environment. Izzy might find a rich life for herself there. Alas, we don’t have the money to repeat the kind of home we have here (Izzy would probably not have the same lovely airy large room with picturesque view), and most of one’s time is spent in one’s home. Still we said we’d think about it again …

And now to settle down to watching my two-hour version of Frederick Wiseman’s brilliant rarely happy documentary, Central Park (downloaded for me by Jim from Pirate EBay).


The first shot of the movie, accompanied by pleasant off-beat jazz

Ellen

Read Full Post »


Demelza goes fishing to provide food (1975-76 Poldark, Episode 11)

Dear Friends and Fellow Readers,

GMU’s spring break is upon us, so I’ve decided to write a blog about where I am in my life just now. Seasonal taking-stock.

A while back the Admiral and I decided we would not go to the 18th century conference (at Vancouver) this year. Too far and too expensive. Now he has proposed (and bought tickets for, reserved train seats even) a series of day trips and excursions for next week. To Richmond, Virginia to see a exhibit of Picasso’s art. To the National Galley in DC one day. Sean O’Casey’s Juno and the Peacock one evening. A ballet another. Izzy will come to some of it — did you see she and I went to Stars on Ice this past Sunday?

I’m beginning to see that I cannot both accomplish my book on the Austen movies and write papers for conferences, no matter how gratifying it is to join in this way, to see what I write become published (or put it on my website).

I have kept my word to myself and am following my own trails more (foremother poet blogs is one of them) and have re-read more of the books I assign my students this year with them (instead of relying on reading them ahead), watched movies slightly ahead as well as reading outside books on these books and movies.

I am close reading an Austen letter each week, and reading in a controlled way with a couple of people on my 3 listserv communities.

I’ve succeeded in helping Izzy to find some social and therapy groups, and gone myself to one.

All this has produced (paradoxically) a little extra time and (as hoped) occasional periods of happiness. Shall I catalogue for you where I’ve experienced the authentic?

Well, for teaching and for myself I’ve reread Winston Graham’s Ross Poldark. I thought to myself this morning while reading it, the happiest time during the day is when I’m reading this book. The true feeling in it is so deeply congenial, so adult. Graham has found a form (historical novel set in 18th century) with just the right characters to allow him to speak his vision of the world, create what he dreams of, speak home. I’ll go on to Demelza once again.
Now and again I dip into a book on historical novels.

So even if I don’t write a paper on historical novels set in the 18th century, I’m finding meaning that matters to me this way. And along with these I’m re-watching the Poldark series and just loving them.


Ross Poldark fixing his pipe by fireplace, his curtains drawn, he’s been paid to allow smugglers to use Nampara Cove; with this he can open Wheal Grace again and farm (Episode 11)

Last night I watched Episode 12. Sometimes I take very good notes and when I’ve done I’ll make a few blogs out of the material.

I’ve returned to my Austen movies book. This is a trial to my spirit — to see how self-indulgent I was and to have to re-write and re-formulate again. Here my “extra” hour a day movie has been the 2009 Emma (screenplay writer Sandy Welch): I am startled how much it focuses on Mr Knightley (Jonny Lee Miller) and how lengthy and developed are his scenes with Emma. It picks out the underlying pathos of Austen’s book to make that what it has to show us that matters. Much has to be sacrificed from the actual book in order to do this as the film is but four hours.


A pathos in the father and daughter scenes, so alone and eager

I am trying to read Julianne Pidduck’s Contemporary Costume Film. Admittedly I’ve not gotten very far …

I’ve been reading Randall Jarrell and about him preparatory to reading with my students his The Animal Family and came across this line: “The soul learns fortitude in libraries”. On WWTTA we are (Fran and I) reading Ingeborg Bachmann’s collected poems as translated by R Firkin, and I cannot speak too highly of these. Here’s one we’ve been going over the last couple of days:

Autumn Maneuver

I don’t say: ah, yesterday. With worthless
summer money pocketed, we lie again
on the chaff of scorn, in time’s autumn maneuver.
And the escape southward isn’t an option for us
as it is for the birds. Across the way, at evening,
trawIers and gondolas pass, and sometimes
a splinter of dream-filled marble pierces me
in the eye, where I am most vulnerable to beauty.

In the papers I read about the cold
and its effects, about fools and dead men,
about refugees, murderers and myriads
of ice floes, but little that comforts me.
Why should it be otherwise? In the face of the beggar
who comes at noon I slam the door, for we live in peacetime
and one can spare oneself such a sight, but not
the joyless dying of leaves in the rain.

Let’s take a trip! Let’s stroll under cypresses
or even under palms or in the orange groves
to see at reduced rates sunsets
that are beyond compare! Let’s forget
the unanswered letters to yesterday!
Time works wonders. But if it arrives inconveniently
with the knocking of guilt: we’re not at home.
In the heart’s cellar, sleepless, I find myself again
on the chaff of scorn, in time’s autumn maneuver.

With my students I again read and talked of Jhumpa Lahiri’s Namesake: how enough of them read and responded deeply to it, how I did. And how we reveled in Mira Nair’s movie of the same name. I spent a few hours on Sunday watching the feature where Nair discussed her motives, methods, and offered montages.


On the one side of the screen, Ashoke (Irrhan Khan) and on the other Ashima (Tabu), the dream using bleached-bypass for melancholy harshness amid the tenderest of lyrical feeling

I finally found that CD recording of Philip Madoc reading all of Pasternak’s Dr Zhivago that had gone missing. Whew! I thought I had lost it. So ordered CD recording of Donada Peters reading all of George Eliot’s Daniel Deronda. Can now await it in guiltless peace. Pleasures of this past month included listening to CD recording of Juliet Stevenson reading aloud all of Austen’s Mansfield Park. Extraordinary variety of nuanced tones. So have her reading Northanger Abbey now too and Izzy and I start tomorrow.

We (she & I) even made plans to start a tiny garden of flowers.

So, you see, how it’s going — at least some of it. I can’t tell all. But of deep unhappiness there also has been plenty.

One area of grief and loss I have to get over, conquer it: it seems that I’m going to have to do without regular correspondences from friends. This had helped to sustain my spirit. Each day, sometimes it seems by the hour, people fall away from the original hopes and enthusiasms they had for a different kind of experience on the Net — from the thoughtful inward writing self. It’s natural that when life style changes or a job does, people haven’t the time they once had. (My life style never does seem to change.) More have been lost in the last three weeks or so than in a long time — or I’m aware of the loss of several. This time not my fault. No fights on lists. One just cold, another (apparently) bored.

Well for those of us who stay on the Net, bringing genuine content to it, emailing to one another offlist, sharing lives, emailing on list, sharing books, now on Facebook, sharing URLs, and thoughts, keeping up a blog, journalizing, my guess is they are as alone and lonely as I feel. Quite probably from different circumstances and what led to this in each case I do not, cannot know, but this need does not bind people together from the point of view of the content of what they write. Only the sheer writing.

I tell myself my poem “I on Myself Can Live.” I like the Portland ms version better. The couplets I used to hold onto were these:

Pleasures, and Praises, and Company with me
Have their Just Vallue, if allow’d they be . . .
If they’re deny’d, I on my Selfe can live
Without the aids a cheating World can give

Other areas I cannot conquer. Such as no job for Izzy, Jim’s loss of his, my lack of any effective practical help. I must take the long view of centuries and remind myself the cruel impoverishing economic world that has been set up to destroy all but the wealthy and well-connected and any public sphere is but a return to what was before the mid-20th century. If Jim, I and Izzy are now put where we would have been, we have been left here with the money and house he and I did manage to accumulate before the world was changed back. I and Jim and Izzy have had our moments at wonderful universities and on trips abroad that cannot be taken away. Apres nous, le deluge.

Our two pussycats won’t outlive us, and Jim thinks we probably have enough to see the three of us out. I can only hope so.


Pissarro?

Ellen
Thursday night into Friday morning

Read Full Post »


Frank Currituck Benson 186201951), Currituck Marshes, North Carolina (1926)

Dear friends and readers,

A brief seasonal blog: tonight in Alexandria we are experiencing the kind of cold that threatens the life of anyone who has to spend the night out in it. I did finish and sent off my paper on the film adaptations of Anthony Trollope to the editor of the coming volume, Adaptation: British Literature of the Nineteenth Century on Film: the title of mine is “Prologomena to a study of film adaptations of Anthony Trollope and Victorian films: the 1974 BBC Pallisers.” Whew!

I start teaching again on Monday, a one-day schedule again, though not as long as last term. I have but two sections this term, one in Advanced Comp in Natural Sciences and Tech, and the other Advanced Comp in Humanities. If you click on the links, you will see the times, places and my booklists as well as the plan in the syllabus for the course. I’ve added a new student model: “The Common Prejudice against Men as Nurses has got to go!”

I have no new books for the Natural Science course but I do have a new experiment: I’m going to screen film The Constant Gardener by Mereilles (from LeCarre’s novel) but instead of asking the students to read the fat book, I’ve ordered the screenplay. I think it may work better for most students and the screenplay book has good essays on the drugs company’s appalling amoral behavior and Africa. I am doing a new book for Advanced Comp in Humanities: Andrea Levy’s Small Island (together with the film); so now with Jhumpa Lahiri’s Namesake I need no longer feel my list of books is so white European I’ve decided to take the leap and instead of assigning books on children’s literature (Mason’s Girl Sleuth) and about reading as a significant experience (Nafisi’s Reading Lolita in Teheran), I’m going to do a brilliant (wonderfully rich) children’s books, Randall Jarrell’s The Animal Family, and a book I’ll present as a girl’s coming of age book (Austen’s Northanger Abbey — see my “A Refreshing approach: a fun experience”) and a book I’ll present as a popular historical romance in the male mode (Graham’s Ross Poldark). So now in the class we’ll be going in search of lost time to semi-popular literature too.

There were sufficient changes to make me have to change many links on my online library for my students, especially for Randall Jarrell, Andrea Levy and Winston Graham. All new texts linked in. Older now irrelevant texts removed.

I begin my teaching work tomorrow. Right now I’m working on my review of Mary Trouille’s Wife Abuse in 18th century France, and keeping up watching movies in the evening. I have not made up my mind whether I will try to write a paper on historical novels (Graham’s Poldark novels) for the EC/ASECS next fall or not. I do so want to return to my book, “A Place of Refuge: the Austen movies” and was not able to this Dec/Jan because I did the Trollope paper.

So readers and friends, that’s where I am tonight. My title comes from James’s Washington Square. I am working hard tonight at accepting our — the Admiral’s, Izzy’s and mine, not to omit out two cats, Clary and Ian’s — lot. I’ve framed this with a natural world picture and a city poem.

*Friday Night at the Royal Station*

Light spreads darkly downwards from the high
Clusters of lights over empty chairs
That face each other, coloured differently.
Through open doors, the dining-room declares
A larger loneliness of knives and glass
And silence laid like carpet. A porter reads
An unsold evening paper. Hours pass,
And all the salesmen have gone back to Leeds,
Leaving full ashtrays in the Conference Room.
In shoeless corridors, the lights burn.
How Isolated, like a fort, it is -
The headed paper, made for writing home
(If home existed) letters of exile:
Now Night comes on. Waves fold behind villages.
– Philip Larkin

Ellen

Read Full Post »


Colin, my fiber optic penguin

Dear friends and readers,

Some people my age have grandchildren, others have great-nieces and nephews: I have two cats and a fiber optic penguin which lights up in a glittery way when I plug him in. I gave him the name I would have given a son had I had one. Colin glitters when plugged in but this does not appear on photographs.

On the other side of endurance tonight. I just gave of myself as a teacher for 3 sets of 2 hours and 45 minutes, 13 hours alogether at GMU.

We are doing Christmas in a small way. As I wrote on Reveries under the Sign of Austen, Izzy and I went to a party for The Birthday (Jane Austen’s of course — coming up on the 15th) where we danced the afternoon away doing patterned 18th century figure dances, up and down the line, in groups of twos and threes. For Snow Reveries (more general) go to Reveries under Austen.

We dare not have a tree again this year. Three years ago the cats attacked what we had (balls, lights, branches) so steadily the tree was wretched looking before New Year’s and they are still so lively. But we did put our white and colored lights out on our bushes in front of our house. We sat them in patterns on top of the bushes so the light seem to come out of the greenery: tasteful and pretty. (At long last we have a safe method: heavy white cord meant for outside, leading through the porch to inside the window and a switch on a panel inside the house.)

I did take Colin down from the attic. At first I thought I’d put him in the screened porch but then I would not see him, and he’d be cold so I have him in my workroom. Outside I fear he’d be stolen and that would upset me.

When my neighbor, Michelle, first gave him to me as a present I sang spontaneously: … Colin, the sledding penguin had a very shiny nose and if you ever saw him, you would even say it glows. All of the other penguins used to laugh and call him names, they never let poor Colin join in any penguin games. Then one foggy Christmas eve, Santa came to say, Colin, with your nose so bright, won’t you guide our sled tonight …


Clary-Marianne not too long ago

Whenever the girl cat, Clarissa-Marianne darts into my workroom she is startled by the lit penguin. She runs away or sits and looks. She doesn’t get to stay in the room long enough to get used to him and begin to investigate.

On the 15th (the Birthday) I will make out my 10 to 12 cards — if I can think of that many snail-mail card friends to send to. I have one cousin and so does Jim to send to.

We have very little to buy and I got it all online. I can’t announce it yet as two of the gifts are surprises for Jim and Izzy. I know Mr Knightley is against surprises, but just this once. For myself I got the DVDs of the Poldark series for the 2 seasons; also Posy Simmonds’s Tamara Drewe and Gemma Bovery.


Ian-Little Snuffy recently

The cold season shows us our cats sitting by the grates. (We have forced heat through grates). In our bedroom the grate is behind a door, and they love to sit in the triangular space between grate and door. Izzy keeps her Italian electric radiator on all the time so her room is cosy warm. Ian snuggles behind her computer and in front of her window on her desk in the sun. Clarissa sinks down amid the blankets near where Izzy sits.

Winter passes.

For The Day we’ll have our token exchange of presents, go to see The King’s Speech (with Colin Firth), eat a yummy meal at Mark’s [non-pretentious] Duck House, and in the evening I’ll watch one Christmas movie — possibly the film adaptation of James Joyce’s The Dead (beautiful moving film). Boxing Day we’ll go to a museum (our tradition) and this year it’s a Victorian exhibit: vast, photography at the National Gallery. And for New Year’s we’ve tickets for a Woolly Mammoth show: Neo-Futurists Girl Guides (?), Too Much Light Makes the Baby Go Blind, with post-show drinks and snacks afterwards.

The hope is to return to the atmosphere and expectations we had in the years 2001 and 2002. We had gone to Paris in 2000 to erase so many previous Xmases (and had had one of our wondrous times — all three of us in Paris, that last day Izzy stood there intensely looking about trying hard to remember the spot where we stood below where we lived), and in 2001 it worked. I remember 2001 happy in a lovely Chinese restaurant after a good movie, the three of us over a duck (had been fired in front of us). We were at peace last year but not back where we had been.

Still just now we are all set: nothing to dread, it will be just as we expect, nothing to surprise, hurt or upset us …


A lovely late 19th century early 20th century December scene: Luigi Loiri: Paris under Snow

I continue this in a more meditative general vein on Reveries under the Sign of Austen: Snow Reveries

Ellen

Read Full Post »


The Isle of Wight, Alum Bay, UK

Dear friends and readers,

My 64th birthday! Who’d have thunk it? I never thought to last this long and really it’s an accomplishment. Millions have died much much younger. It takes nerve.

And since yesterday (a couple of days now) I’ve had the Beatles’s famous jaunty tune , “When I’m 64 …” And the line: “Will you still need me?” I mentioned this to Jim and the Isle of Wight came up as I sang another jolty ironic line: “We will scrimp and save … ” (make sure your voice goes up and becomes screetch-y at the end of the line). The Admiral rejoined, “If it’s not too dear.” Alas, ’tis. Plane fare you see. Never mind, said I; it’s overrated.

Then to Izzy this morning, “Remember going there the summer we stayed in Sussex in the Duke’s hunting lodge?” At first not, but I reminded her of that noisy bouncing boat that took us over a sort of vaporetto. And taking the bus to Winchester one day (to see from across the street the house where Jane Austen died and to go into the cathedral to see the plaque placed over where she was buried); and on another day a bus to and all about Portsmouth (with a young man as our good-natured guide at the top) and then walking on the ramparts (a Mansfield Park pilgrimage). She laughed. “Yes many houses in rows.”

Still, Fanny Price thought very highly of it …

Ellen

Read Full Post »


Kenilworth, 1575 reconstructed

Dear friends and readers,

As you may know, for the last two weekends I have been away: for 4 days in Portland, Oregon, for JASNA AGM, preceded by the Burney conference, whose topics were the Abbey (NA) and gothic respectively.


Kenilworth, popular 1814 print

And for 1 night, 1 day and 1 morning Pittsburgh, EC/ASECS annual meeting whose topic was “recovery.”


Kenilworth, Sporting Fields photo, early 20th century: an angle & vision used in recent film adaptations of 18th/19th century novels

The topic for the 1212 JASNA AGM in NYC, is “sex, power and money.” Izzy made a good suggestion: why not focus in on the depiction of cities in Austen’s work. Her idea is look at “Sex, Power and Money” in the towns Austen depicts. I can see that; as I think about it, I realize that there is a strong animus against the town; it’s where people are hurt, are betrayed, it’s dangerous; it’s ugly (in Portsmouth), cut off from the natural world and its rhythms.

Another possibility (but not probable) is a paper on Burney’s journals for the Burney conference in 1210 (piggy-backed onto the JASNA).

Having chaired two panels successfully, I’m also thinking of proposing for the next EC/ASECS whose topic will be “liberty” (held in Penn State) a panel on 20th and 21st century novels set sometime in the long 18th and 19th century novel. Of course I want to write a paper on Winston Graham’s Poldark novels. My problem here is I have got to get up a respectable line of argument. Alas, most historical novels are not respected (this is most unlike the 19th century) and seen as romance. So I am trying to gather secondary materials (essays and books) on historical novels in the 20th and 21st century as well as Graham to give me ideas beyond the super-abstractions of post-modern thinking. Christine Clark-Evans, organizer for the coming EC was enthusiastic and open to all sorts of approaches so I’m hopeful I’ll come up with something for real.

She also suggested I send in a second panel call, saying I need not chair that one too. So I’m thinking I could propose applying Isiah Berlin’s conceptions of “positive” and “negative and positive liberty” to 18th century novels and memoirs. I define these (after Berlin) this way: Negative liberty is what you can do after you have counted in all the constraints society and your own needs put on you. Positive liberty is knowing who you are apart from all this from within and seeking to enact it; then when you agree to do what someone else wants in order to get what you want, it can be seen as a freely taken form of acting, not servitude or enslavement. Then one would see how these sub-genres and concepts act out in recent fiction. Is it different for 19th century fiction in the way filming an 18th century book or matter produces a probing of modern familial and sexual pathologies and 19th century social and economic and class issues.


Kenilworth, 1850 photo

I admit developing a new set of routs is a challenge. I am teaching; I have still this (very enjoyable) book on Austen films to write. This project now includes reading about time-travelling, an essential dream that is part of the longing to return to the Austen world and also fuels the films.

I’d like to add a project on Graham and historical novels set in the18th and 19th century novels/memoirs, and read solid (informed, thoughtful &c&C) articles & books (if there are any) about historical fiction in the 20th and 21st century. I’ve read a few on historical fiction in the 19th so this will help, but the subject is not the same at all as attitudes have undergone a sea change. This would be towards the EC/ASECS panel I mentioned above but I’d be doing it for myself. I see that it was his novel, Marnie, upon which Hitchcock’s once famous (if commercially failed) movie was made; and have gotten a superb film study by Tony Lee Moral on the film. I’d learn a lot about film from reading the novel, seeing the film, and reading this book. This would ‘feed’ into my JA movie project.

For further off projects/absorbing work, I met and talked with Gillian Dow (whose paper on Genlis’s Countess of C******** was an argument just like mine: that this gothic is a central source for NA). She told me about a coming 1213 conference at Chawton library which will celebrate the 10 years of this place devoted to women writers of the 18th century. She liked my ideas for a Charlotte Smith paper.

I will really watch out for 1213 Chawton one, and budget that year accordingly. Jim even said, why don’t we try for Cornwall that summer, one week in Hampshire and one in Cornwall following the imagined worlds of Poldark and DuMaurier too (I’m a lover of DuMaurier’s historical gothic novels too).

Not to omit plus read for fun and to join in with other on my listservs.

It feels too much and I might not be able to do it all. I’ll try for I don’t want to give anything up any more: “one cannot have too many holds on happiness” says Henry Tilney. Maybe I ought also to make my motto one of Trollope’s favorite aphorisms (from Macbeth): The labour we delight in physics pain.

Ellen

Read Full Post »


Graham with Angharard Rees (who played Demelza in the original two series)

Perfection is a full stop.
Give me the comma of imperfect striving,
Thus to find zest in the immediate living.
Ever the reaching but never the attaining
Of the mountain top (Memoirs of a Private Man, Book 2, Chapter 11, p. 312).

Dear friends and readers,

I read this book over the weekend I was at the JASNA — in the later evenings when I returned to our room. Thus unlike all the other Graham books I’ve read thus far I don’t have detailed notes from chapter to chapter, but I have managed a blog where I cite the pages of the important sections.

The book is worth while for far more than understanding Graham’s work, especially his historical novels and later mature realistic mysteries.


Winston Graham walking along cliff path, Porth Joke, Cornwall

It exemplifies all the typicalities of a male autobiography (man seizes opportunity, man gets ahead, man is success); rich in content about Graham particularly, his outlook, methods, and about the inspirations and background of the Poldark novels. There are useful sections on historical novel writing, on how he achieved human realism in his later mature mysteries, and much candor about the way deals are made to film books and how this kind of thing is so variously done.

For women the contrast of this Horatio Alger kind of story and say Elizabeth Jane Howard’s Slipstream (which I’m reading just now and is by an author often similarly ignored and who lived during the same era) is instructive. Even more for women, is the long section on his once famous novel (and it’s still in print), Marnie, which Hitchcock made a movie of (and tried to get big stars to come on board but could not). A strongly transgressive female (cold, not all feeling, not caring — we are told on IMDB she has “serious psychological problems”) who fascinated Graham. There’s a long book on The Marking of Marnie (an early film-making type book which analyses film and book sophisticatedly). I’ve ordered it. It’s in this book that Graham is called “an instinctive feminist.”

One interesting element about historical writing which he emphasizes in a more general way than he does in Poldark’s Cornwall is how important geography is to the historical novelist. The historical novelist has to want to visualize, imagine, live in a particular place, unearth and visualize and make it alive, and out of that comes the cultural patterns that people living at that time had to respond to.

************
So, first as a professional author: Graham’s early chapters include (especially Chapter 3) his long period of apprenticeship: how at 18 he began to write on his own and did not attempt to go to university nor get a job that was unsuited to his temperament or would have used up his time and not allowed him to develop his gift for writing. He was very lucky in being the second son, born much later than the first, to a woman who had sufficient private income to support them both. She could, however, have been intolerant and bowed not only to the norms then and now, but the ridicule heaped on her son for “doing nothing.” He was fortunate in one relative: his father’s younger sister, an unmarried woman, persuaded him not to leave his ms in the drawer, to type it, and then she bound it lovingly in two boards and it was sent to Ward and Lock (publishers of Trollope volumes in the early 20th century).

“Life is not kind — nor is it in any way even-handed (Book 1, Chapter 3, p 38)

From a very young age, he wanted to write (age 5); the writing industry or literary marketplace at the time included many small publishers to whom an author could send manuscripts; if and when, an author was accepted, the contract was simplicity itself. He had actually stockpiled novels (novels he had written and not sent out) and was able to keep up attention to himself by sending along a novel quickly after the first to be published, and one after that. He was reviewed in big dailies and locally. This is a modest chapter as he does not praise what must have been gifts to draw positive attention to himself.

Later in the book we see how he was picked up by Book-of-the-Month club after he had written Marnie and that book had been filmed by Hitchcock.


On the set of Marnie: Hitchcock, Tippi Hedren, Graham

He calls himself “the most successful unknown novelist in England’ (p. 117); the first choice was a historical novel, The Grove of Eagles (Cornwall, 16th century). Although not personally known as a name until the film series, Poldark, his books sold widely and it was certainly noticed by publishers, and once he was one of the Book-of-the-Month club choices among the non-chattering classes his “name” spread. We see how step-by-step his career built: from his abilty to socialize easily and make friends, to his Poldark novels being picked up by film-makers who persisted in wanting to make a film series (comparable to Gone with the Wind he says — that is, a historical saga), and how through several successes (selling modern mysteries, US Book-of-Month-Club, Poldark novels and films, Hitchcock films), he got into groups of people who led him to join a London club, the Savile (p. 112), where he met the finest authors and minds of his era.

List of his novels

List of films


Graham in the coast guard, 1941

Second, as the autobiography of a male. It follows (almost uncannily if you know it) the outline of Trollope’s autobiography: obscure boy of a fringe-genteel family makes good. Underlying the book is the idea that opportunity strikes and it’s up to the individual to seize and make the most of it, or should I say a series of such opportunities strike, and the individual must be both quick and lucky to take what’s coming and then he succeeds. Like Trollope’s (and many other life-writing by a man) we hear almost nothing of his wife (Jean) and lo and behold he is suddenly marrying her; we are for long stretches (especially the early years of the marriage), told little of their inward intimate private life together except exemplary statements (like she was ever cheerful, it was she who supported them at first by her abilities as a landlady), and he never says much at all about his children, except to name them, and indicate they are around now and again, tell their marriage dates and children when it seems the chronology fits. He tells of his early visits and then life in Cornwall and how and why the place meant so much to him, and how important geography is to the imagination of the historical novelist (who is a romancer after all).


Winston and Jean Graham, later in life, on a Cornwall beach

Women’s autobiographies (of which I am reading one just now, Elizabeth Jane Howard’s Slipstream) tell of the intimate details of who their husbands are before they marry them, how they come to marry, their children’s lives, and the structure is not one of opportunity knocked and see me on my Pegasus soaring, but a cyclical structure, repetitious, with much beyond the writing life meaning a great deal and brought out explicitly as central to characters and stories in the work. By the end of the book when Graham has told of his continual traveling (there’s a list of places and times went comparable to Trollope’s list of sums made), and dropped so many famous names (like Gregory Peck and his wife), his jaguars, if this structure were not the bare bones of a much richer outlook poured into it, the correct term for the book ought to be Memoirs of a Socially networking financially successful writer. The public man not the private one. What he’s private about (but does not lie) is his sexual life and misdeeds and deep misgivings (which two he does not tell — but then as Trollope says which of us has not done mean acts and which of us can bear to tell them).


Graham and his dog, Garrick, named after Demelza’s dog

However, the book is much better than that, and one sign of this is how after the initial phase of Graham growing up, it breaks chronology continually, and jumps forward in time suddenly to explain say his inner life as a writer and his aims in his fiction, feelings about, and thorough descriptions of many different books and how they were written, or filmed, and, occasional sudden eruptions of some of his deeper beliefs about the nature of experience, and how people perceive it – the kind I find in the Poldark novels often attributed to Ross Poldark at particularly disillusioned and bitter moments (Book 2, Chapter 3, pp 178-79).

“I rely on hearsay for everything that has happened in the world before I was born, and the world as I know it, till end on the day I die. When I become part of ‘the dull, the indiscriminate dust’ there is nothing to prove to me that anything will still go on, any more than that anything existed before I opened my eyes and blinked up at my doting parents. Nothing can prove to me that the world and all it appears to contain has an objective reality. I know it has a subjective reality but no more … I burn my finger and I feel the pain. I feel nothing of the horrible pains of a thousand martyrs who have been -. it is said – burned at the stake for their beliefs, or disbeliefs. Even among my nearest and dearest there is no transference — can be no transference — of experience. One can feel empathy for someone suffering, but one cannot feel the suffering. We are all alone — desperately alone.

It’s in these long displaced chapters that the reader sees the sources of the Poldark novels and the later realistic ones, which use the mystery plot-design to keep the reader going but are about believable ordinary people caught up in circumstances of high violence and trauma, guilt-ridden, puzzled, not knowing how to act but acting impetuously (the last two qualities are very much Ross’s), but becoming trapped in a pattern they don’t understand themselves. He also himself describes what he thinks is good novel art, discusses (as he does in Poldark’s Cornwall) the types of historical fiction as he sees them and the demands and skills historical novels require (above all self-control not to dump irrelevant information the author has dug up as part of his immersion in the era), as well as (for him) its rooted nature in a place, geography, and cultural moment. The Poldark series of books meant enormously to him, even before they became the sources for the fame- and money-making TV films. Cornwall where his family went when his older brother looked for a new home outside southern England, where he lived with his family for many years, is central to this preoccupation.


Lamora Valley, Cornwall

It’s also apparent he formed some real friendships with the actors and actresses who played the central roles. Here’s a comic photo of Jill Townsent waiting on the set to be called, smoking a cigarette

Since I did not take notes as I went along (which are in effect) what my weekly postings to listservs really are, I will tell only what I remember best from his direct discussions of the Poldarks as well as (not unconscious but not admitted to) descriptions of his private life, and especially himself and his wife which shed eye-opening light on the novels. In these latter revelations he is like Trollope too who discreetly lets us know (for example) he had liaisons as a young man and casual encounters with women as an older one traveling, and that he loved Kate Field. In a long chapter on his relationships with a group of wealthy artists and patrons, he discreetly suggests female loves (e.g., Book 2, Chapter 2); he gives little vignettes of conversations between himself and his wife later in life which ring with the voices and ambivalence of an intensely bonded-partnership between Ross and Demelza.


In the film series, Robin Ellis as Ross when he first takes Angharad Rees as Demelza home with him

Graham does say at one point Demelza is an idealization of his wife. His tolerance in his novel over Demelza’s adultery with Hugh Armitage (in The Four Swans) can be seen in the broad calm way he does not become enraged and hysterical when his crippled wife is nearly raped in Eygpt by a (hideously) unscrupulous guide. He tells the story simply, making it obvious that in such a place and country they’d have no one to complain too.


Cornwall coastline: long view of where the BBC filmed

There are a number of chapters detailing the writing of the Poldark books, his impulses about them as he went along: Book 1, Chapter 5, pp. 66-90, Book 1, Chapter 6, pp. 97-98 (“Demelza was finished lovingly …”). The Forgotten Story is another historical novel deal with ( Book 1, Chapter 6, p 103); he shows real interest and understanding of film-making in his discussions of (among others, Marnie (Part 2, Chapter 8, pp 138-47),

“Lee describes me in his book as an instinctive feminist. Maybe that is right” (p. 142)

Who else makes marital sex in coerced marriage an occasion for insisting it’s a form of nightly rape. I was (I admit) delighted to learn that at the conclusion of the second trilogy Morwenna is rid of the lout Whitworth and marries Drake at last. Graham knows that the actor playing the part of Whitworth (Christopher Biggs) has a heavy load of association to carry with ordinary naive readers so goes out of his way to characterize Biggs as a remarkably cordial man and his friendship with Jane Wymark (who played Morwenna, the raped woman-wife).


Christopher Bigg and Jean Graham on the set

He also cites Robin Ellis’s opinion that Kevin McNally who played Drake delivered the strongest performances of all.

We learn more details about the inspiration for the Poldark landscape, characters and film-making both of the first series and second and later than we did in Poldark’s Cornwall (Book 2, Chapters 4-8, pp 182-234, 10, pp 279-83). This long section is frank about who wanted to do the series, the companies involved, how the first proposal seemed to be going somewhere and then was cut off, why it was refused when it was again taken up, how the different two series were conceived, and (especially interesting) how the 1995 film while interesting film-making, showed the film-makers and screenplay writer had “a total blind ignorance of what Poldark was really all about” (p. 224). I regret to say that Graham does not go on to say just what that is, but hope my several blogs have outlined sufficiently what some of this is.

It seems a final break came when Robin Ellis and Angharad Rees backed out of the second film because they saw their characters were going to be not only sidelined but made a travesty of. Graham did an interview where he did praise the series (in the hope) that this two-hour trial balloon would not be the only attempt, remembering how he disliked the first episodes of the first series, but it was never published, he thinks because there was a deliberate attempt to sabotage the film as the fan clubs which had grown up around the original series had become powerful. Fan cults are by no means fruitful of good results in writing or the life of the author they purport to celebrate. Graham attributes the failure of this last effort in his life-time to make another series of films on the Poldark novels to insistence of the British producers on following the US model of financial success (and less risk), where what’s favored is a one episode two-hour film; what his novels needed (as he had in the long years of writing) was slow leisured build-up to make their effect. (This, he says, is very different from the art he practiced for his modern books).

In the last chapters of the book he tells of his later modern novels (Green Flash, After the Act) as earlier he tells of Angell, Pearl and Little God (which includes his own criticism, pp 149-56), Marnie (pp 151-55).

All this is rich material for someone wanting to know him too, and he ends his book by saying (very like Trollope) he has not been a bad man (loved his wife and she loved him, did not terrorize, browbeat or woefully neglect his children, never frequented public lavatories &c&c)) and also does not go to literary lunches or advertise his private feelings, ideas and life and need not because

“I have by now written a great many novels, and must through them have surely revealed a fair amount of my own nature and public feelings. Let that suffice.
Tolstoi says somewhere; ‘There is no point in visiting a great writer, because he is incarnate in his works.’ Should this not to some extent be true of the less important writer? Even down to the least important of all” (Book 2, Chapter 11, p. 312).

I love the ending on his philosophy as a writer which I have made the epigraph to this blog. And I much respect and agree with his assessment of what makes a good book and kept his fine: when you do continue to write “with such integrity, it can’t be all bad, and it can’t be all lost”

I don’t know why the website devoted to Graham’s work has a photo of an old typewriter on it. Graham specifically says more than once that he never typed his novels. He wrote them all out in long-hand and his drafts are revisions in long-hand. He feels that he did not feel the life-blood of what he was writing except as it came through his body into his arms. I suppose it’s a case of this continual (and here I must think unconscious) misrepresentation of authors when they don’t conform to the usual. Graham didn’t conform quietly. He liked to think of himself as a quiet non-conformist man — though he was also strongly ordinary (as when he more than once goes on in a negative about homosexuality. He could not have had the continual professional successes he had had he not appeared to conform and that cannot be pulled off so easily in a life as much in public (though his many novels and the films) as his was.

Perhaps after this is a photo of the typewriter used to transfer Graham’s ms’s to readable copy after the long-hand fair copy draft was made. Graham does say early on his aunt urged him to type an early book before sending it off, but he neglects to tell us who his amanuensis (or typist) was in later life.

Ellen

Read Full Post »


A favorite fall picture: Camille Pissaro (1830-1903), Quai malaquais, Morning Sun (1903)

Dear friends who read this blog,

I thought I’d say that today I have finished both versions of my paper on the gothic in Northanger Abbey: a 31 minute version called “People that marry can never part:” an intertextual reading of Northanger Abbey” for JASNA at Portland, Oregon; and a 18-19 minute version called “The Gothic as Recovery in Northanger Abbey” for EC/ASECS in Pittsburg, Pa. I achieved the cuts by removing the sections which set the gothic patterns in NA in the context of Austen’s S&S, Emma and Persuasion, and slashing the fourth section of Margaret Atwood’s Lady Oracle to a tiny coda. The other three books I deal with are Genlis’s Countess of C******** (& 2 other gothics) in Adele et Theodore (1783); Charlotte Smith’s Montalbert (1795), and Anne Fuller’s The Convent, or The History of Sophia Nelson (1786).

I’m not quite through yet: tomorrow I will do myself the justice of changing what needs to be changed to obey conventions and send the longer paper to Persuasions. If they are willing to publish it, I’ll be proud. If not, sobeit.

Still I’m sighing with relief. This one has been a hard one for me: intertextual reading is hard to do. I did learn a lot about the gothic and have expanded my horizons and understanding of it considerably.

My hope now is to do less. Yes I’ve got stacks of student papers and midterms coming in this and next Friday, but now I have the time for them. My aim is to go slower. I’ll still work on projects towards publications because it gives me goals, meaning and a sense of “getting somewhere” for some kind of self-reward. My book-project on Austen films and my old idea of Bad Tuesdays in Austen will be my first two up. I’ve also promised a conventional review to be published of Mary Trouille’s Wife Abuse in mid-18th century France by next May.

I want to relax more and also try other things, maybe to return to routs the way I used to follow them before the Net. Maybe this means stopping earlier and being relaxed about what I am doing. My good friend Nick phrased what I’m after well: “Something which you can go at your own pace on and is not so responsive too other people’s demands.” Yes. Especially that latter phrase.

I’d like to read more for myself. The problem is I don’t know what to read that way. It’s so haphazard and I find most descriptions of books don’t tell me what I want to know about them in order to choose which ones. Nothing in all the descriptions of Winston Graham’s Poldark novels (for example) let me know what is in the inner life and value of these books at all. Only a few truthful, able and genuinely ethical writers about their reading or experience of this or that artwork (including films) do this.

The lists have partly functioned this way all these years: they supply me with ideas for the next book (I need, want, try) to read.

I began two days ago by taking out time to make another blog on Austen films: I admit I am delighting in Lost in Austen: We must not reproach ourselves for our unlived lives.

Routs (by the way) is Daphne DuMaurier’s term for how she organized her life to find peace. For me it’s a way of keep my sanity and keep my deep sadness, loneliness at bay. I’ve had a couple of profound losses these past two years, and an ugly experience this past month: I allowed Queens College, CUNY, to fleece us: gentle reader, it’s one of the many badly and corruptly run institutions of this world and I advise you to stay away from it. They have $9600 of my money and I can’t get a dime back nor probably even an apology for what occurred. I did know it was a place for the unprivileged. I should have put it that the past history of being (in effect) for free still affects the way individual students are treated as cogs that must fit in the wheels of the powerful in the school with no concern for their well-being beyond them doing that. When I was 17 to 20, it was all that I could reach to help me escape from my wretched limited existence, and I did win a scholarship to go to England and found an alternative livable existence I have been able to endure and get some satisfaction from that way. Well, if I had forgotten or began to live under delusions (which the admiral accuses me of) about its behavior or attitude to its students, I will do so no longer.

I seek comfort but cannot find it but in absorbing my mind in aesthetic work.

Ellen

Read Full Post »


Godolphin House, Cornwall, used as Trenwith, the Poldark family home (1975-76 Poldark mini-series)

Dear friends and readers,

Tonight I had a familiar experience: the Admiral and I were on the way to a opera in DC, and as soon as we got into the car, and upon opening my latest Poldark novel, Black Moon (the fifth of the Poldark series), I fell straight into it. I forgot I was in that car until we arrived at where Jim was parking; then we walked to the Metro platform, and upon opening the book to wait for the train, happy absorption; the train comes, I look up and get in, sit down and the upon opening the book … No matter where I am it seems, I can lose myself in a Poldark novel.

This blog though is about Poldark’s Cornwall (1983), a sort of light autobiographical meditative essay as travelogue by Graham on the Cornish landscape today, its geology, ancient and 18th century history; and on his writing of the Poldark novels. He tells of its people, followed by a suggestive outline of his own stays there, from a boy vacationing on a trip with his family, to a younger man living there as a writer with his family for what seems to have been a considerable time, to an older one still returning there periodically for the deep pleasure of revisits. We learn of his later time as a consultant for the lead-up to the first BBC mini-series based on his books, his immersion in the second. He includes his thoughts on historical fiction, something of how he came to write the Poldark novels, put them down after writing 4 (Ross Poldark, Demelza, Jeremy Poldark and Warleggan 1945-53) and then took them up again twenty years later, just before and during the filming of the series’s second season (Black Moon, 1973 and then Four Swans and The Angry Tide, 1976-77). It’s a large book printed on art paper to accommodate many stunningly beautiful photographs by Simon McBride, many of which are not connected directly to the novels or TV series:


Trevelgue Head, iron age fort near Newquay

though many are:


St Winnow Church, Cornish perpendicular church, used for the wedding of Dwight Enys and Caroline Penvenen in the second series (1977-78, Poldark)

Poldark’s Cornwall has cheered my heart just before dawn for quite a few near-days. Yes it’s a kind of forced-made-book, made to call attention to the film series, but it has much to recommend it. Quietly Graham calls attention to the terrain and beauty and history embedded in the seascapes and houses and people of the peninsula. He quotes with a good eye from his own brilliant evocation of this place in his last three books used in the series (Black Moon, Four Swans, Angry Tide):

So they all went to look, at least as far as the stile leading down to the beach)· further it was unsafe to go. Where the beach would have been at any time except the highest of tides) was a battlefield of giant waves. The sea was washing away the lower sandhills and the roots of marram grass. As they stood there a wave came rushing up over the rough stony ground and. licked at the foot of the stile) leaving a trail of froth to overflow and smear their boots. Surf in the ordinary sense progresses from deep water to shallow) losing height as it comes. Today waves were hitting the rocks below Wheal Leisure with such weight that they generated a new surf running at right angles to the flow of the sea) with geysers of water spouting high from the collisions. A new and irrational surf broke against the gentler rocks below the Long Field. Mountains of spume collected wherever the sea drew breath) and then blew like bursting shells across the land. The sea was so high there was no horizon and the clouds so low that they sagged into the sea.

and includes much informative and insightful material on his books, method and the TV series.

*****************

Cornish fisherman

First, he offers the reader a deep sense of the land- and seascape as central to his vision and writing of historical novels: that’s where he sets them, and he says that after putting down the novels for 20 years, he returned to them after he had spent three summers in Cornwall. Avril Horner and Sue Zlasnick in their book on Daphne DuMaurier define a subgothic kind they call “Cornish Gothic,” to which they say DuMaurier’s Cornish novels, all of which take place either in the later 17th to later 18th/very early 19th century, belong: Frenchman’s Creek and Jamaica Inn, both about smuggling; My Cousin Rachel an imitation of Lorna Doone, and King’s General (set during the English civil wars). As Mary Waugh in her Smuggling in Cornwall and Devon shows, the later 18th century was a “high” point in smuggling. The patterns in the Poldark novels are not gothic, but some of the women character’s subplots do follow the paradigms of female gothic: both of these reflect the real and different circumstances and inculcation and what happens to women for real in their lives.

To evoke this Cornish gothic sublime sense of the land- and seascape, history, culture of Cornwall, Graham quotes the following two stanzas from an anonymous lyric he attributes to Tennyson. It’s not by Tennyson but is 19th century:

Nine large piles of troubled water
Turbulently come;
From the bosom of his mother,
Each one leaping on his brother,
Scatters lusty foam.

In the sky a wondrous silence,
Cloud-surf, mute and weird;
In the distance, still uplifting,
Ghostly fountains vanish, drifting,
Like a Druid’s beard.


The North Coast above Boscastle, near Crackington Haven

In this opening section and throughout Graham offers many casual scattered details about history, life style, specifics of families, legends, as well as scattered suggestive details about his boyhood times in Cornwall and when he lived there later in life. I leave this to the interested reader to find out about by reading the book.


The perpendicular gothic windows of St Winnows

*****************
Historical fiction and the Poldark novels.


Launceston Gaol

When he turns to his novels, Graham presents strongly the reality that a historical novel is the vision of the writer (p. 148). “If there is no personal view, there is no art.” He knows that historians downgrade the historical novel because it colors or shapes history. He does not himself go on to say historians do the same (Haydn White would).

But he does say: “if he [the historical novelist] is good enough he creates a world of his own which the reader comes to inhabit and finds it comparable with life rather than identical with it.”

He divides the kind into three types: those which use actual historical personages as chief characters (I Claudius); second where historical personages are substantial figures but main characters are fictional (Scott); third where the characters are “entirely, or almost entirely fictitious” (Stevenson, and of course his own; so too Margaret Mitchell I’d say). He says in the literature there is a tendency to rate the first and second types much higher than the third and this is “pretentious rubbish.” Fine novels, works of art, and truths about history occur in all three.

What I really like are the final paragraphs in this section (p. 149). Human beings have not changed “but their reactions to life patterns” have and do, and the writer must understand and try to transmit these to the reader. There must be geographical truth too as setting is often essential to the art of the historical novel.

Of enormous importance is to “select” what historical fact you use. I paraphrase him here (quoting some of his words too): You must do a lot of intense homework and reading. It’s” tedious to enumerate all the sources” of the Poldark books, long hours of research to illuminate this or that event, into “old newspapers, travel books at the time, parochial history, manuals, autobiographies,” contemporary fictions. He then goes over a whole slew of events in the first few novels which are rooted in history and business and economics and politics and geology (p. 149).


Cornish mine opening, with pink flowers

Nonetheless, there is “the opposite risk, that of becoming too preoccupied with history. One can so easily detect the midnight oil, the desire to instruct. But novels are about life.” So even if you are “reluctant,” once you have “discovered something at great trouble, not to make the most of it, resist that. Writing historical novels are a recurrent discipline where you use only what is relevant to the moment of the living fiction.” What is not relevant is irrelevant. (p. 150). Here is the key to difference of writing wooden stilted books and living breathing ones.

*****************
Origin of novels


Roscarrock, used as first still in second series where Ross and Demelza greet one another once again

Graham tells of how he named the characters and what originals they were built partly out of. Ross Poldark is based on man who was Graham’s best friend in his twenties: Ridley Polgreen, a young chemist, died tragically at 32. Not like Ross in the sense that he was Wesleyan, non-smoking, non-drinking and lively sense of humor, but like Ross in his “appreciation for all that was good and beautiful in life.” Ross’s physical appearance comes from a chance acquaintance in a railway car in WW2: tall, lean, bony, scarred, heavy-lidded eyes, pale blue, back from wars, not one to flinch, broken leg; a quiet man, tense, purposeful, a vein in his neck, and — most important for Ross the character “a vein of high strung disquiet.” (p. 191) “Polgreen seems not quite strong enough. So the name Poldark came into being.”

Jud and Prudie Paynter were also transmutations of real people, Jud a man Graham used to see on a nightly pilgrimage to a pub (same “voice, grimace, toothless gums”), a figure of comic pessimism, obstinate, drunk, doom-laden religion, and his sister became Prudie (pp. 196-97)

He had the idea that Ross’s wife and love would be a dark waif he picked up at Redruth Fair, but was a long time before discovering a name and identity. He came across the name on a signpost, which he later passed many times. According to William Pryce, author of Mineraologia Cornubiensis, “De” means “the” or “thy” and “Melza” means honey or sweetness. So Demelza means “thy sweetness” (pp. 191-92)

Others: “Nampara” means “the Valley of the Bread,” an ancient name, taken from a village known for its bakery. “Warleggan” is also the name of an old village on the Bodmin moors: “a lonely place, and one almost impossible to get to witout traversing the desolate moorland.” Cold, wet, swathed in fog, grey, much “moorland granite, harsh-wind scoured countryside” — just right for this character. The family did flourish in the 18th and 19th centuries in Cornwall. The “one-armed asthmatic rascal, boyhood wild companion of Ross, also a revenant (in Black Moon he first turns up) Tholly Tregirls is named after another village on the Bodmin moors. Clowance, the name of Ross and Demelza’s fourth child, the first daughter to live, was the name of a family home of the St Aubyns (pp. 195-96).


Bodmin moor, a woodland in spring

*********************
The twenty-year hiatus and first attempt to film the books


Tressilick House, used as Ralph Allen Daniell’s house in the second series

Graham tells of the great difficulty he had getting back into the novels after a twenty year break. Although he says his return to the novels was not predicated on a need for more material for the film series, the two events were intermingled at least.

An attempt had been made to film the first 4 novels in 1969 by Associated British Pictures. It was intended to last 4 hours and be a Cornish GWTW; he and Kenneth Harper, the producer, Vincent Tilsney, the projected writer and team went to Carlyon Bay Hotel at St Austell and spent 4-5 days in Cornwall. Tilsney wrote a brilliant script but it was too long — over 5 hours. It fell through. EMI took over ABP and incoming moguls axed old projects.

But London films bought the option on TV rights and interested BBC in a joint production. The real force behind the project became Robert Clark, ABP chairman at time of take-over, so someone there in 1969 too. He became chair of London Films, a re-invention of the old costume drama Alexander Korda film company who Pam Cook discussed in her book both on national identity and the costume drama. Korda films are as of 1983 still very popular. This group made I Claudius, Therese Raquin and Testament of Youth (pp. 162-63).

So in 1975 it all began.

Now in 1969, there were only 4 novels (Ross Poldark, Demelza, Jeremy Poldark and Warleggan) and for the first film series, the story matter went into the opening of Black Moon (1973). Inbetween Warleggan and the time of attempting Black Moon, Graham had written 8 modern and 1 historical novel, The Grove of Eagles, about 16th century Cornwall.


Lanydrock, Jacobean mansion (renovated in the 19th century), used for Sir Francis Basset’s house (second series)

He claims there was at the time (1973) no inducement to write Black Moon as the movie project had died and seemed dead that year. But creative stirrings were in him, partly he says a reaction to not returning to Cornwall for three summers going after having gone there with the TV creative and business people.

He says it was very difficult for him to get back into these novels, to move from “taut, compact modern” text to this “more leisurely broader-canvassed” kind of thing. He had to revert to another style re-pick up characters, situations, clothes.

As he talks it’s apparent the first four books’ most powerful resonance in his mind and heart are rooted in four imaginative presences: Ross, Demelza, Elizabeth and George (p. 144). But he did not reread for that would have killed him, he wouldn’t “dare” and feared his response. Only dipping in to refresh memory — “it was as if the characters had remained dormant in the subconscious waiting for the word.”


Elizabeth (Jill Townsend) and George (Ralph Bates): Elizabeth in the films presented successfully as far more nervous, unsure of herself than the reader might realize; George is more petulant, less fierce and hawk-like, but just as domineering

The “first hundred pages [were] like breaking sound barrier.” And it was a comparatively “non-profit making activity,” His modern novels did much better and appealed to Hitchcock and others. Of course now TV changed all that (pp. 153-163).

I can confirm that the opening section of Black Moon does seem more impersonal than anything in the Poldark series before or since (after that first hundred pages or so). Twenty years has gone by. And Graham is feeling it. There is a note which reminds me of Austen’s prefacing her Northanger Abbey – she is uncomfortable because 13 years have passed since she wrote the original version of NA. Well, Graham is aware and says 20 years have passed and he is feeling it; he has experienced much since. Further, he is aware that he stopped in an unusual or strange. He left off his Warleggan in a scene where Ross and Demelza are not quite reconciled, as he puts it here, “they were trying to recover from a near-mortal wound and they were trying to reassure themselves. The quieter levels of absolute trust which had existed before had not been regained (Black Moon, p. 27).


The opening embrace of Ross (Robin Ellis) and Demelza (Angharad Rees) (second series)

So he has a little trouble getting into it I thought. He worried that too much experience had gone by and he had lost the feel, having written and lived so much since, but he says he had a need to return. “Sometimes the totally unexpected occurs, and one day, for no discoverable reason, it became necessary for me to see what happened to these people after Christmas night, 1793. I became very preoccupied with finding out, and it appealed to me, rightly or wrongly, that to return to an old mood was as much of a challenge as creating a new one. The Black Moon is the result.”

Tellingly, Black Moon begins with the Warleggans and not just with George (Ross’s enemy) but switches quickly to George’s father, Nicolas: in Ross Poldark he also began with an older man, Joshua, Ross’s father, as he lays dying, and once again proceed to remember, recreate a world from the older generational perspectives even if what we have is the ironical incident of the birth of Valetine Warleggan (the child who resulted from Ross’s night in bed with Elizabeth).

Really he creates anew, I noticed that with Book 4 the whole world is filling out (as with Trollope’s Dr Thorne, the third Barsetshire book is the first one to have a consistently filled out map), so now we have our first genealogical tress. Not quite persuasive because years of the same generation often don’t match and especially before the 20th century. Gradually Black Moon comes alive, the poetry starts up again, as we enter Demelza’s thoughts in Chapter 2, when Ross comes home and we read Caroline’s letter to them about the Warleggan christening. I’ll write more about Black Moon when I’ve finished the book.


Bronze Age, neolithic tomb, 1700-1500 BC

These neolithic stones in a Cornwall bay are not far from the house Graham says he had in his mind for Trenwith. It’s a great hurt for Ross the way the Warleggans have taken Trenwith and a great cause for exultation in George.

NB: By the time of the writing of Poldark’s Cornwall (1983), Graham had added The Stranger from the Sea (1981), The Miller’s Dance (1982) and was probably at work on The Loving Cup (published 1984). Only The Stranger from the Sea was ever filmed, a 1995-96 attempt which received such hostile resentment that no film has been made since.

*******************

Port Isaac Harbour, filmed in the first season

Poldark’s Cornwall ends with Graham’s comments on the film series. He intensely disliked the first four episodes of the first series — so he differed from the commonalty, for from the outset this series was spectacularly popular. He suggests that as the film-makers went along they did better from his standpoint which was to convey his meaning and his sense of the era. One of the Poldark writers never read any of Graham’s books which did irritate and showed in his episode.

He was strongly involved and consulted for the second series. e first remarks on the procedure of having different directors and writers for individual episodes, basically to keep to the schedule. He also did have some sharp disagreements at first when he came aboard — just as Robin Ellis said he did (in his valuable Making Poldark), he did, but compromises won out — as too much money was at stake and careers too. He had not finished his Angry Tide the last book of the series to be adapted by the time the second series started — one can see how he did return to these novels (no matter what he says) something under the gun.

There was talk of a third year and central actors were ready to do it again, but the problem was Graham had not written the books as yet :) . He balked at this kind of forced and contrived book making. If one looks, one finds 4 and 3 years between these books and once 20; only the first two and the last three but one came out every two years (which is the schedule asked of commercial writers if they want to keep their name before the public). So he declined, “apart from the public, it would somehow have been letting down the fictional people about whom I have come to care so much.”


Quin Cottage, Port Quin, used for Blamey’s house

*************************

Houses off Port Quin

The book’s coda or postscript contains Graham’s admission he has made the characters and books more “in the sun” than “shadow” and perhaps they have been less respectable because of this. He did this out of his experience of life. He’s known sadness and disappointment, but on the whole sees a mixed skein. Saying this though his tone is melancholy, retreating, quiet, and the last lines quote Catullus famous sonnet to his dead brother, about which recently Anne Carson has produced a moving translation and book. Atque in perpetuum, frater, ave atque vale

Through foreign seas and over foreign lands,
Brother, to your sad graveside I have come
To lay the gifts of death with my own hands
And speak, too late, some last words to your dumb,
Unanswering dust. Poor brother, who was torn
Brutally from me by ill fortune, take
All I can give you now-these few forlorn
Offerings made for ancient custom’s sake
And wet with a brother’s tears. There’ll be no other
Meeting; and so hail and farewell, my brother.
Translation by James Michie

“But next summer perhaps the sun will be shining again.”

And thus the book ends.


Trevalls Porth, Bawden Rock

The above the place of many scenes between Ross and Demelza (the apocalyptic close of Series 1, wholly invented for TV) and Drake and Mowena (Kevin McNally and Jane Wymanfrom Black Moon, about which more soon):

Ellen

Read Full Post »

To know what you prefer, instead of humbly saying Amen to
what the world tells you you ought to prefer, is to have kept
your soul alive. — R. L. Stevenson


Our house, 1984 (Jim’s mother, me, two daughters): it has not changed all that much


Our backyard: you see Izzy’s windows last summer

Dear Friends and Readers,

Over on facebook, someone told of a long day’s struggle to order, throw away, pack, and generally empty out his parents’ home (possible so as to sell it). What exhausting work emotionally and physically. Well his words reminded me of a moving diary entry in the LRB by August Kleinzhaler where he told of his experience of selling his childhood home. Rooting up your memories, and throwing them away.

How much our houses can mean to us. I will never comprehend the lack of feeling so many people display towards their environment, their house. They fix it in accordance with “market values!” Yes, when we did renovate the above, for we did, a little (new windows, installed new appliances in the kitchen, put in airconditioning, a new heater, painted), the man doing the kitchen wanted me to have certain kinds of woodwork along the kitchen cabinets because without that it won’t resell at a higher price. I’ve repeatedly come across people who make their houses into magazine-imitative places, with rooms set up for show (thus the need for a so-called family room). They are careful to make the show rooms impersonal: keep out signs of their real loves and occupations. Rooms are carefully distinguished as to purpose. We do all things in all rooms each of us likes; the rooms are partly distinguished by which of the three of us basically dwells there.

On his last visit to our house (1987 or so) my father remarked:

“It’s getting to look like Seaman Avenue” to which Jim replied, “These things take time, Willie.”

How important memories we have and how they are made concrete and perpetual for us by their local habitation. Do others not value their memories? To understand how a house can mean explicates why the gothic uses houses to signify terror, horror, deep perversion for in these spaces the memories are anguish, sorrow, corrosive. I actually don’t have such memories here, or they are minor, didn’t dominate even when we had a bad spirit here at times, and have now been contained and I can live in these spaces at peace.

How women are taught to hate themselves: it is so common for little girls to have dollhouses. Like dolls, this kind of toy is sometimes despised, and even by mothers of daughters. I’ve known women to take away a daughter’s doll at 11. To me this is scorning one’s gender. It is partly circumstance, partly the construction of women’s lives, but also temperamentally female, to value the intangible, the inward, memory, why women are good at ghost stories. I built three dollhouses with my two daughters; we still have one large Edwardian one in Izzy’s room, shoved in a corner, gathering dust now.

I put pictures on the walls which have symbolic value for me. Scotch-tape them up. Here is my library table seen at an angle:

I’ve changed those pictures again. Hattie Morahan as Elinor Dashwood still has pride of place though.

Much as I long to move to NYC, to sell where we live now would be erasing a 30 yr existence, and probably we’d have to sell our house as a tear-down. No one but us would value it. The thought of what I’m told I would have to do to “prepare” it for a buyer, make it attractive to a typical one is what I can’t bear to do. I hesitate to picture what would replace it even so (for this would just be the veneer) given the soulless McMansions and magaziny-looking houses that have gone up or are wrapped around other houses in my neighborhood. (One good effect of the depression is this kind of obscenity has stopped for a time.)

“Our books, dear Book Browser, are a comfort, a presence, a diary of our lives. What more can we say?” (Carol Shields, Swann).


A corner of the room I mostly live in, where I work and read and write.

On wompo someone asked where we literally read and write messages from and where we read them in cyberspace: I sit in my “workroom” or study in my house; it’s filled with my desk, two library tables, my husband’s desk (he sits in the living room), favorite pictures on the walls, lamps, bookcases, a closet with clothes and some of my stuff for writing or teaching. All the rooms in our house but the bathrooms and halls have two outer walls with a large window in each. So too here and I look out on a pretty old fashioned suburban scene (neighborhood built in 1949-51). The bookcases are my Austen and Trollope collections. I change the pictures on my wall as I feel like it. Pictures of friends and cats are on another wall. Poscards. On my computer Canaletto, [In front of] Northumberland House, London, a fresh fair morning, mid-century, peaceful, orderly.

Close to hand, near to heart.

THE ROOMS OF OTHER WOMEN POETS

By Eavan Boland (from Object Lessons in Outside History, pages 20-21, Norton, 1990)

I wonder about you: whether the blue abrasions
of daylight, falling as dusk across your page,

make you reach for the lamp. I sometimes think
I see that gesture in the way you use language.

And whether you think, as I do, that wild flowers
dried and fired on the ironstone rim of

the saucer underneath your cup are a sign of
a savage, old calligraphy: you will not have it.

The chair you use, for instance, may be cane
soaked and curled in spirals, painted white

and eloquent, or iron mesh and the table
a horizon of its own on plain, deal trestles,

bearing up unmarked, steel-cut foolscap
a whole quire of it; when you leave I know

you look at them and you love their air of
unaggressive silence as you close the door.

The early summer, its covenant, its grace,
is everywhere: even shadows have leaves.

Somewhere you are writing or have written in
a room you came to as I come to this

room with honeyed corners, the interior sunless,
the windows shut but clear so I can see

the bay windbreak, the laburnum hang fire, feel
the ache of things ending in the jasmine darkening early

I read messages mostly as emails using the gmail board, as emails on Yahoo sites, and nowadays on blogs, and facebook; once in a long while I check archives of lists online. I let the messages come in separately for four lists (my three at Yahoo ’cause I’m listowner, and Austen-l & wom-po since those listservs wreak havoc on messages). And because of all this my life is rich with friends. What matters in life is soul activity.

Hitherto, I have made it a policy to write autobiographically only on Reveries under the Sign of Austen; today I yield to temptation and begin to make my life apart from reading, movies, the arts part of this blog too, and link the two together. So last week at Reveries I wrote of The Return to Queens College: Autumn Entry and for two other examples, Christmas, 2009 into 2010 and Halloween 2009.


Our pussycat, Clarissa, aged 4 months (she is now over 2 years) sitting on Richardson’s Clarissa in our library house

Ellen

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 93 other followers